top of page

RANDOM INSIGHTS

RANDOM INSIGHTS  -  2015  -  To Articles & Letters... 

110.  Community opinion sought on CBD future

 

Based on the comments on the initiative, it is 'damned if you do, damned if you don't'! I think the initiative should be considered in good faith, and is a positive move. Here is a great opportunity for the people of Newcastle to be heard loud and clear on what we want for our city and region. It is better to be in the tent than outside it, and ensure we hold our community and business leaders to account and to their word. .

 

Newcastle Herald - 22 July 2015

109.  LETTER: Our CBD keeps moving west

 

I am more optimistic about the gradual reshaping of the 'East End' to 'West End' Newcastle corridor precinct. As long as any new development complements, does not vandalise and respects our City's heritage and landscape, then change should be seen in a positive light.

 

It has been known for a while that the 'West End' would become the 'new' CBD'. So long as the 'East End' and former CBD precincts aren't left to rot, and becomes a more vibrant space to live and visit, then we should embrace the change.

 

Having said that, we need to ensure any change serves and services our community at large, not just business interests. And on this latter point, i am still of the view that the original rail line corridor should have remained as it is the most practical, cost effective outcome, and will better service our region's public transport needs.

 

Newcastle Herald - 11 July 2015

108.  Dawn Fraser tells Kyrgios and Tomic to 'go back where their parents came from'

 

Dawn Fraser, our 'national treasure', has diminished herself with such a comment based on ignorance. I would not want our ''national treasure' to be relegated to 'national trash' by such myopic commentary. It represents the worst of Australia, not the best.

 

The Guardian - 7 July 2015

107.  LETTER: Fast-tracking requirements

 

A 'High Speed Rail Study' was initiated by the former Federal Labor Government. The study looked at connecting Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney Brisbane and other regional centres, including Newcastle. It won't be cheap at a cost in excess of $100b and counting. In time, the economic, social and environmental benefits will outweigh the costs, but it will take a visionary Government to make it happen.

 

The Abbott Government are not visionary, so it will more likely take a future Federal Labor Government for this vision to become a reality.

 

Newcastle Herald - 3 July 2015

106. EDITORIAL: Say I do to gay marriage | Poll

 

To those who are against 'same sex marriage', should you be so concerned? Will it truly impact or impair your personal life? If so, how? For people who don't support it, will anything really change in your life once 'Same Sex Marriage' becomes reality in Australia. No one expects those against it to embrace or accept this reality, but only to afford same sex couples the same rights to marriage - nothing more, nothing less.

 

Newcastle Herald - 2 July 2015

105. Bill Shorten's crisis of confidence: how poll frontrunner became hollow man

 

Abbott is probably the most disliked and perhaps despised Prime Minister to be elected in the past 50 years. Shorten's only challenge is to demonstrate to the Australian voters that Labor can be fiscally responsible and reveal a sound economic plan. If Shorten can achieve this, they can win in a landslide

 

The Guardian - 26 June 2015

104. Mark Scott fires back: 'I hope no one wants the ABC to be a state broadcaster'

 

Abbott must be confused as to what the ABC stands for. It does not stand for the 'Abbott Broadcasting Corporation'!

 

The Guardian - 26 June 2015

103. Mark Scott fires back: 'I hope no one wants the ABC to be a state broadcaster'

 

Dare I say the greatest threat to Australia's national security and democratic values is Abbott himself. He constantly plays to the lowest common denominator, bringing out the worst in Australians, inciting fear and hatred, for pure personal political gains. Abbott is a 'divide and conqueror', not a uniter of peoples...

 

The Guardian - 26 June 2015

102.  Q&A: Malcolm Turnbull launches investigation, warns of “consequences”

 

This issue is a masterclass in fear-mongering propaganda by Abbott which even Goebbels would be impressed with. It is a deliberate over-reaction for pure political purposes. ABC should stand its ground.

 

Freedom of speech and an independent ABC are crucial for a democracy and Abbott is comfortable to crush fundamental rights for political means. 

 

If one doesn't agree with the Q&A program, don't watch it! It is like subscribing to 'The Australian'. I don't necessarily agree with some of the politically biased opinions of this newspaper but I respect their views nonetheless and am willing to pay for these views. 

 

And I'd rather know what someone is thinking than not. The ABC did Australia a favour by allowing this person to express their misguided views.

 

But I am more concerned about the Government's intentional response directed at the ABC, which I view is to try and keep the ABC on a leash with a possible impending election. It is political thuggery, which Abbott does best.

 

The Australian - 25 June 2015

101.  Tony Abbott refuses to rule out paying people smugglers to turn back boats

 

This is stunning. What if an Australian citizen was held captive by the ISIS terrorist group, and a ransom was sought. Would Abbott pay the ransom and help fund ISIS to save an Australian life?

 

I suspect Abbott will be happy to pay 'people smugglers' to save his political life, but not the life of a captured Australian citizen on the brink of beheading.

 

Abbott's credibility is shot to pieces. 

 

The Guardian - 12 June 2015

100.  LETTER: Majority rule requires caution

 

Thanks Ian, I actually agree with you to an extent. The concern on this particular issue is that some elected representatives will vote based on their personal beliefs (which includes religious beliefs) and discount their electorate's view in their consideration. But I agree with you that 'majority' does not mean it is the right decision - but on this issue I believe it is. Excellent points raised.

 

Newcastle Herald - 28 May 2015

99. Budget 2015: $2.4bn savings in age pension payments at top end

 

These pension proposals are not only financially responsible but politically smart.  Scott Morrison has produced the right pragmatic balance which the majority of pensioners and welfare groups will support.

 

By Labor refusing to support these proposals, they will alienate many within their traditional Labor voter base. If Labor was politically smart, they should support these changes.

 

The Australian - 7 May 2015

98. LETTER: Pulling diplomat pointless move

 

Thanks Steve. The Australian Government had every right to lodge their protest in regards to the impending executions. Abbott had spoken to Widodo about the matter, and Bishop was in constant communication with her Indonesian counterpart. So it's not that there was no communication.

 

While I do not support the death sentence, the unfortunate fact is that Indonesian law allows it. The Australian Government would expect other countries to respect its sovereignty and its rule of law.

 

The media circus included Australian and other overseas journalists and there is no substantiated proof of corruption. While it would have been decent for the President to return the PM's calls, and the selfie was in poor taste, it is not a reason to withdraw an Ambassador. The Australian Government underestimated and misjudged Widodo's resolve on the matter. Politics played a major role in the final outcome, as it does on all issues.

 

The Australian Government may have overplayed its hand through the media, and Abbott clumsily tieing the tsunami aid to this issue did not help Chan and Sukumaran's cause.

 

So it is not so much that I have misread the situation but IMO the Government did and then over reacted by withdrawing its Ambassador

 

Newcastle Herald - 7 May 2015

97. Budget 2015: Tighter pension assets test

 

If Abbott was known as 'Dr No', Shorten should surely be 'Professor No'. Shorten's whingefest is becoming increasingly tiresome. The pension changes make prudent sense and believe many Australians will support this shift. Shorten risks alienating even Labor supporters with his persistent policy negativity. 

 

The Australian - 5 May 2015

96. LETTER: Their country, their laws

 

Gina, our Prime Minister and Foreign Minister has every right to argue for the lives of citizens in overseas countries. Foreign Minister Bishop in particular was exceptional in arguing the case against the death penalty for the two Australians. Would you not expect the same if you, family members or friends were in a similar predicament?

 

There is unfortunately no simple solution to illicit drugs. We live in a society where we'd rather relax, cope, fit in, or escape from the challenges of life through drugs. This includes alcohol and smoking. While there is demand, there will be supply.

 

Also, the actual reality is alcohol and tobacco use are greater problems in our society than other drugs when it comes to health related issues (including death and violence), and costs the Australian economy billions of dollars annually.

 

But I support your concerns about the growling use of illicit drugs in Australia.

 

Options to deter production, supply and drug use should also include increased awareness and education particularly in the schools, real life graphic stories of the damage illicit and legal drugs does to the body and mind, harsher penalties for supplying or taking illicit drugs, providing alternative employment opportunities in poorer and poverty stricken countries where producing illicit drugs becomes their main livelihood, and effective rehabilitation programs.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 1 May 2015

95. Calm leadership needed amid Indonesian execution tragedy

 

The whole tragic episode demonstrates that in the political world, one is willing to sacrifice human life for a one's own political survival. 

 

There is no excuse in what Chan and Sukumaran did. But if they had truly been rehabilitated, then these 'foreigner' murders were quite simply by the 'President', political barbarism in its lowest form.  

 

I believe no matter what avenues the Australian Government pursued, the Indonesian 'President' would not have budged. This was purely a 'leader' endeavouring to give the perception of strength for his own political survival and popularity. But at the end revealed a man of weakness, and lacking the qualities that makes a true leader of men. 

 

But we should not judge a nation by a 'President' or leader in name only. Leaders come and go, but the underlying relations between our nations will outlive them. It is time to re-strengthen and rebuild what may have been lost in the relationship between our two nations.

 

The Australian - 30 April 2015

94a. I'm not obsessed with interest rates. I'm not!

 

Peter Switer responding to my 'Random Insight' No. 94

 

 

 

Switzer Daily - 27 April 2015

94. I don't want a rate cut but we need one! - The Experts

 

Peter, this is bordering on 'interest rate 'obsession. Thank goodness you're not Governor of the RBA. You'd have the money printing machines working overtime, crashing the $A through the 50c barrier! :)

 

Monetary policy is now close to 'inelastic' or impotent. The RBA should hold onto what is left of its interest rate ammunition. The RBA should wait and see what the government does with fiscal policy, what happens in Greece, what happens in the UK election especially if Labour wins, and determine the flow on effects of China's loosening monetary policy. This will help the RBA assess the value or benefit of another rate cut.

 

While I agree with creating confidence in an economy, I also tend to believe successful people and businesses have the nous, self belief and confidence in succeeding, regardless of external factors, particularly government policy or the state of the economy.

 

We should be less dependent on external factors and focus more on what is within our sphere of influence to succeed

 

Switzer Daily - 24 April 2015

93. Negative gearing has already been neutered

 

Adam, your article actually reinforces the policy debate on making adjustments to negative gearing. Negative gearing contributes to foregone government tax revenue of around several billion dollars annually.

 

Investors benefit from tax breaks not only through negative gearing, but also through capital gains tax discount rules when selling their investment property.

 

Labor are being politically brave in tackling negative gearing but it's the right thing to do, considering the Government and country's debt and deficit challenges now and in the coming decades.

 

While I don't believe Labor's recent policy announcements on superannuation were not extensive or holistic enough, let's see how serious the party is in reforming negative gearing. Making changes prospective rather than retrospective is sound, suggesting that negative gearing only applies to new developments will continue to alleviate with any housing supply challenges, and limiting the number of investment properties in which tax deductions can be claimed is fiscally prudent.

 

Negative gearing is not the only policy area under review, or the 'scapegoat' for the country's budgetary challenges. There is a Government tax reform process in train and to believe that negative gearing will be the sole focus to improve the country's budget ills is silly at best.

 

The Australian - 24 April 2015

92. Age pension changes inevitable, Labor’s Nick Sherry warns

 

You get the sense that the Federal Labor leadership team are policy lightweights. Even the superannuation announcements yesterday were piecemeal and failed to tackle the challenges of the current retirement income system (both private and public) from a holistic perspective. It's lazy policy making.

 

The Opposition party want to trip into Government without a clear and extensive policy reform agenda.

 

The Australian - 23 April 2015

91. Labor plans to rein in super concessions for wealthy in bid to raise $14bn

 

Labor's superannuation proposals just tinkers around the edges of real reform, adds another layer of complexity to superannuation rules, and also creates a greater administrative burden.

 

It would have been better if:

 

1) The 15% Contribution Tax was totally removed, or alternatively remove the 15% contribution tax in its current form, and tax the employer superannuation contributions in the hands of the employee at 0% where an individual’s salary is less than, for example, $150,000, and at 15% for every dollar above the salary level of $150,000. This would result in 'lower' income earners paying little or no tax while 'higher' income earners would pay more tax, but at a maximum rate of 15%.

 

2) Tax on Investment Earnings should be taxed at a rate of 15% for both accumulation phase and pension phase plans. 

3) The Howard Government’s ‘Simpler Super’ changes on 1 July 2007 resulted in superannuation benefits paid as a lump sum from a taxed source for those aged 60 or over became tax-free. The ‘Simpler Super’ change effectively encourages individuals to prefer a lump sum payment to an income stream, especially for those aged 60 years and over. 

Existing superannuation lump sum rules should be altered for those under preservation age and those aged 60 and above so more tax is payable on lump sum withdrawals. A 15% tax should be applied to lump sum withdrawals over a threshold for those at preservation age and above. 

4) At least 50% of accumulated superannuation savings must be converted into a retirement income stream. There is currently little incentive for a person to commence an income stream instead of taking out a lump sum payment. The risk exists where people ‘double dip’ – where superannuation funds accumulated over a person’s working life is effectively drawn down prior to age pension age, and then allow individuals to access the social security system to fund the remainder of their retirement years.

 

The Guardian - 22 April 2015

90. LETTER: Tahlia's tale demands action

 

The seriousness and urgency of Lyme Disease is severely underestimated by Australian governments and the medical profession. There must be more research funding to identify animals in Australia which can transmit the disease. Strains in one country can differ to those in another country, so we need to identify and better understand the strains which exist in Australia.

 

It's not just ticks that can carry the bacteria, but potentially mosquitoes, sand flies, and other insect biting animals. It can imitate such conditions as MS, MND, Parkinsons, in which no known cure currently exists. Lyme Disease may possibly be one of the triggers for these and other conditions.

 

Blood testing in Australia for Lyme Disease is embarrassingly deficient and must improve. Treating Lyme Disease is not easy, and the costs for treatment can be exorbitant. And there is no guarantee in being healed once it is established that you do have Lyme and the myriad of associated co-infections. So more funding is required to identify more effective treatments for overcoming this insidious disease.

 

Lyme Disease is one condition in which the Australian and State governments and the medical profession have failed the individuals suffering from the disease and their families.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 21 April 2015

89. If Joe Hockey wants to cut company tax, here's the smart way to do it

 

As we live in an interconnected global economy, with increased capital mobility beyond national borders, won’t lowering the corporate rate entice further foreign and domestic investment, encourage more research and development, innovation, entrepreneurship, and create greater productive capital stock within Australia?

 

And won’t the flow-on effects will be an increase in national income, technological advancements, productivity improvements, better employment, wages, GDP, and economic growth outcomes?

 

Doesn’t a lower 25% rate more closely align with other nations’ corporate tax rate, improves the attractiveness of Australia as a destination for investment, as well as minimise the risk of businesses moving and investing offshore, or foreign multinationals moving profits offshore?

 

While the headline rate is, for instance, 25%, why not implement a minimum effective rate of tax payable (eg 18-20%) by companies regardless of whether tax deductions and exemptions claimable by a company results in the effective tax rate exceeding the minimum effective tax rate?

 

The Guardian  - 20 April 2015

88. Young woman stands up for Muslims on train and video goes viral

 

We need to build bridges of common understanding and knowledge between cultures, not tear them down due to misunderstanding, ignorance and fear. The young woman is to be applauded for her fearlessness in defending the Muslim couple from this ignorant racist rant.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 16 April 2015

87. EDITORIAL: Reserve under pressure

 

The RBA is wise to hold off on a further interest rate reduction until such time as it is clear what the Government intends to announce in the Federal Budget, including further debt reduction plans, as well as ensure it does not further overheat the property market.

 

On the international front, it is likely awaiting growth developments in China, and outcomes of the latest discussions concerning the Greek economic crisis.

 

The reality is the RBA is running out of ammunition and must now save its interest rate bullets for significant downward shifts in economic activity and growth. A fall in the Australian dollar has also helped in the RBA holding off on further rate reductions.

 

Further falls in the Australian dollar is currently unlikely to greatly help iron ore producers as the issue is one of significant oversupply of iron ore in the market.

 

Also, since the Global Financial Crisis, sensitivity to downward movements in interest rates have become more 'inelastic', with more prudence in people's spending behaviour, with people saving a greater proportion from interest rate reductions.

 

In the current economic climate, a loosening of fiscal policy is more likely to have a greater effect in boosting economic activity and growth, rather than monetary policy alone.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 8 April 2015

86. Hunter downgraded in cabinet shake-up

 

I am not overly fussed with the devolution of the Minister for the Hunter role. I believe regional type Ministries are more political and symbolic than anything substantially tangible. It provides the perception that the Government cares more about a particular region. But IMO it's more political than anything.

 

In 2011, the Liberal Party had possibly a once in a generation opportunity to capitalise on their victories in the Newcastle and Hunter regions. Unfortunately hubris set in and took the hard earned victories for granted, through the ICAC allegations, and not listening to how an overwhelming number of people in our city and region wanted our city revitalised and transformed.

 

I believe that the Baird Government will reconsider the rail decision, particularly in light of Goward and Berejiklian no longer the ministers for the transport and planning portfolios. Play their cards right, and the Liberal Party may just have a shot in recapturing some seats in our region. But they must first engage and genuinely listen to the people's needs across the community in our region, not just business interests.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 2 April 2015

85. Crakanthorp savours second win

 

Without a doubt, Labor's victories across the region is a clear repudiation of the newly elected Baird Government on truncating the Newcastle rail line. This was front and centre the key issue of the election campaign in Newcastle.

 

Premier Baird, Transport Minister Berejiklian, and Planning Minister Goward made the Newcastle vote a referendum on the rail issue. The overwhelming number of voters have spoken - call it 'the people's mandate' - the Baird Government does not have the mandate to truncate the Newcastle rail.

 

The Premier must heed the will of the people, stay true to his word, and commit to the revitalisation of Newcastle, but with the rail line reopened.

 

To do otherwise is to disregard and disrespect the electorate of Newcastle... again!

 

Newcastle Herald  - 30 March 2015

84. Is it time to abolish compulsory super? - The Experts

 

By asking 'young Australians' whether they would prefer cash over superannuation is akin to offering a prisoner the key to their prison cell! We need to take a more rational, common-sense and multi-dimensional perspective.

 

Why not allow home purchases within one's superannuation fund? And what about accessing superannuation to pay off tertiary education debts, or even weddings?

 

If superannuation is accessed for purchasing a home, then there should be a legislative requirement that the amount accessed be factored into the calculation for receiving Centrelink payments, such as the Age Pension. This should be the gateway for the home to be included as part of a rejigged assets/incomes test for social security purposes, or taxed for CGT purposes

 

Are Australians overly obessesed with home ownership? There are studies that suggest renting can be a better investment strategy certain scenarios. Why not invest in property trusts, or other property shares and diversify one's portfolio. This should help future generations being less 'asset rich, income poor', and in having a greater focus on being more 'income rich', particularly in one's retirement years.

 

Switzer Daily  - 26 March 2015

83. OPINION: Cost of health ups premiums

 

Is this an 'opinion' piece or an info-mmerical for NIB?

 

Private health insurance premiums are increasingly crippling household budgets, and it won't improve. There should be a parliamentary inquiry or independent review into private health insurance to ensure better outcomes for customers, not just shareholders, and the health industry.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 20 March 2015

82. Editorial: Hockey's super proposal

 

The Treasurer and the Government are being prudent in putting policy ideas out in the public domain to gauge the level of support for the idea. The Government is damned if they do and damned if they don't. The public have complained about a lack of engagement and consultation on policy ideas from the Government. But as soon as the Treasurer offers a 'thought bubble', he is crucified!

 

While I believe superannuation savings over one's working life must be predominantly used for one's retirement years, there is merit in having an open and rational discussion on the idea of using superannuation for purchasing one's first home. At the end of the day, it is our superannuation savings, and why should we be restricted from accessing some of our savings from superannuation.

 

My view is the Government's position on this issue is a precursor to having the 'home' included as an 'assessable asset' for superannuation, retirement income and age pension purposes.

 

For Australians to continue to receive first class quality public services in health, education, welfare, and ensure security and protection of our nation, we must have an open and frank discussion on a variety of issues. This means all policy ideas should be open for debate, including using superannuation for home purchases

 

Newcastle Herald  - 18 March 2015

81. Let’s ask not what my country can do for me

 

The article raises some valid points on the role of Government. Though the bias is on individual/family welfare. 

 

There are too many layers of government. We can start by removing one layer - preferably, at the State level. That should save us billions of dollars annually on bureaucracy, inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and waste. 

 

Corporate welfare should be another serious focus of government. We should challenge subsidies, tax deductible items, rebates, concessions and the like on industries across the economy. That should save Australians billions more in annual revenue! 

 

The Australian  - 11 March 2015

80.  Still waiting on the PM’s ‘stunning’ return

 

The key dilemma for the Prime Minister and the Liberal Party is that people are now confused what they stand for! The Government's 'corrective policy action' is not so much 'corrective' but antithesis to their core Liberal beliefs. 

 

The most recent policy backflip on financial support for the car manufacturing industry shows a Party who have lost their way on policy values and principles. Are the Liberal Party the 'New Labor' as a means to capture the middle ground? 

 

Voters are in a dilemma - do they vote for a Party which have lost its way, or vote for an Opposition and Party who seem afraid to say what they stand for as a result of their current policy vacuum? Based on the polls, it appears the latter!

 

The Australian  - 11 March 2015

79. Medicare co-payment failure: how not to impose economic reform

 

Now that the Prime Minister has cleared much of the policy 'hangovers' from last year's Federal Budget, the Abbott Government Mark II starts on Thursday with the release of the Intergenerational Report. It is the opportunity for Treasurer Hockey to take the initiative, and to shape and drive the policy agenda leading up to the May Federal Budget.

 

Hopefully Hockey has learnt from the lessons of the last Budget; to clearly spell out the economic challenges facing the nation, to engage and consult on policy options and solutions. Hockey may yet well be the best Treasurer Australia has ever had - assuming he gets the policy levers right, and creates a more sustainable economy and equitable society.

 

If Hockey gets it right second time around, he will definitely deserve a cigar this time! 

 

The Australian  - 4 March 2015

78. Abbott must put a stop to Andrews’ East West Link lunacy

 

A fair and balanced opinion piece is obviously not the intention here. Was it not the former Premier Napthine who inexplicably put the new Government and the people of Victoria in this financial predicament, particularly knowing Labor's position on the link and an impending election? Napthine played Russian roulette with the State's finance and blew it big time. 

 

But two negatives don't make a right! The current Government should have honoured the contract knowing the financial repercussions, or if legally feasible, utilise the same contractors for other infrastructure work with the funds in the State. 

 

The Australian  - 4 March 2015

77. If a rate cut is coming, why wait?

 

I believe the RBA made the prudent and right decision to keep interest rates on hold this month.

 

With China dropping interest rates by 0.25%, the Federal Government easing off on aggressive debt reduction, the Greek economic crisis being alleviated (for the time being), it reduced the need for the RBA to drop their rates and have greater monetary policy ammunition in the coming months.

 

Another consideration is whether since the GFC, sensitivity to downward movements in interest rates have become more 'inelastic', with more people tucking away a greater proportion of savings from rate reductions than spending.

 

A loosening of fiscal policy is more likely to spur economic activity and growth, rather than monetary policy alone.

 

Switzer Daily  - 4 March 2015

76. Medicare co-payment: Unpopular budget measure set for chopping block

 

If the Government increased the Medicare Levy to 2.5% which also covered the 0.5% for NDIS, my view is the majority would have accepted this option. The bigger concern is private health insurance premiums which is increasing at an annual rate greater than CPI, and eating up more and more of a person's and/or family's budget. I'd rather pay a 5% health levy and opt out of private health! IMO, the issue of private health insurance is a bigger issue than co-payments!  

 

The Australian  - 3 March 2015

75. Five-point detente would win Malcolm Turnbull right to rule

 

There appears to be a number of entrenched right wing ideologue Liberal Party supporters who proclaim they will never vote for Turnbull if he becomes Prime Minister. Fortunately they are in the minority and I believe will be outflanked by more centralist type voters who are more likely to shift their vote to a Turnbull led Coalition Government. 

 

Sometimes we can get caught up in the emotion of a change, but the change is not as bad as we make it out to be in our head and heart. Would you rather Turnbull as Prime Minister than a Labor Government currently lacking in any credible economic policies? Let's get some perspective!  

 

The Australian  - 28 February 2015

74. Malcolm Turnbull reason hints at new way

 

The llamas, I mean the horses, have bolted! Rightly or wrongly, I predict that by this time next week, Australia will have a new Prime Minister and a new Treasurer. Such is the power of the fourth estate to install and so easily remove a Prime Minister. Are elections just a fanciful democratic decoy to appease the masses? 

 

The Australian  - 27 February 2015

73. Malcolm Turnbull reason hints at new way

 

Are we witnessing the dying days of the Prime Ministership of Tony Abbott? The Liberal Party are in the midst of a self-inflicted implosion. You have Turnbull and Bishop subtly and cleverly undermine the authority of the Prime Minister, and the ongoing internal leaks revealing a Government in political disarray. 

 

Abbott cannot afford to dump Turnbull or Bishop from the front bench as that will certainly give Turnbull the opening to precipitate a leadership challenge. But things cannot continue as they currently are for the Prime Minister, for the Government, and more important for the country. 

 

Something needs to give, otherwise sooner rather than later, business and consumer will suffer, and inflict more pain to the economy.

 

The Australian  - 26 February 2015

72. Labor MP calls for Tim Owen to lose honour

 

Tim Owen served in the Defence Forces and served our nation with distinction. Despite recent discretions, Tim Owen is deserving of the Order of Australia honour and I see the request by Shellharbour Labor MP Anna Watson as a politically motivated, shameful and despicable act.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 25 February 2015

71. Newspoll: Tony Abbott rallies, Coalition at four-month high

 

While Australia has seen better Prime Ministers, members within the Liberal Party must give Abbott some clear air rather than continually undermining his authority and destabilising his leadership. 

 

I will admit I am not the Prime Minister's greatest fan, and have previously voiced an opinion in wanting Abbott gone, particularly following the Prince Philip debacle. But Australians believe in 'a fair go', and Abbott deserves this. 

 

The public are becoming increasingly frustrated with Labor as they have failed to present credible alternative policies. And Labor's Shadow Treasurer further undermined its credentials to manage the economy by not knowing the income tax scales, and his feeble attempt to explain the scales. 

 

In my view, Abbott should be given at least three months after the upcoming Federal Budget to prove himself. It's the Australian way.

 

The Australian  - 24 February 2015

70. Newcastle rail line: Tim Owen insists no-one forgot cabinet document on truncation plan

 

How can someone not 'recall' seeing a key document on the most important issue in Newcastle? If one was to read between the lines, the 'i cannot recall' defence is tantamount to a get out clause by Tim Owen.

 

Someone within the Government released the 'Cabinet-in-Confidence' document. This is a failure of Government by breaching confidentiality. The whole of Cabinet, past and present, should have been asked to front the Inquiry to answer questions, not just the two 'Tims'. But I suspect you would have got the standard 'I don't recall' defence from attendees!

 

Is this a politically motivated exercise by Baird to distract from the Government's Cabinet breach, and undermine the credibility of the sitting member of Newcastle weeks out from an election? Or is there something more to the story?!?!

 

Newcastle Herald  - 23 February 2015

69. Prince Philip a knight for fortnight before PM revealed captain’s call

 

It's the 'Rupert' factor! Ignore Rupert Murdoch at your political peril. Abbott ignored Murdoch's demands to remove Credlin, and the Prime Minister is paying for it now. Political death by a thousand cuts. 

 

The Australian  - 23 February 2015

68. The lady’s not for turning: Peta Credlin vows to stay put

 

If Credlin was a bloke, would we be having this conversation about a Prime Minister's Chief of Staff wielding power or being influential in the corridors of power. We need more strong, smart, decisive and passionate women like Credlin in influential positions within public life. Credlin must remain put.

 

The Australian  - 23 February 2015

67. We, the people, are the threat to fiscal reform

 

A passionate opinion piece. Unfortunately the reasons why the Abbott Government have struggled on the reform front can be explained quite simply:

 

  • The Abbott Government betrayed the Australian public's trust with the broken election promises - for example on health and education. Arguably, the public do not believe the Government has a mandate on budget policy measures taken to the last election. 

 

  • The Abbott Government's 'debt and deficit' storyline has not wholly resonated with the public, as the view is Australia's debt levels are not as calamitous as other nations. And the Government have failed to sell this message well to the majority of Australians

 

  • The Abbott Government have failed to clearly articulate the case for reform. The Prime Minister and particularly the Treasurer have been appalling and lazy salesmen. 

 

  • The Abbott Government's consultative and negotiation skills with industry and community groups, and the Senate on particularly health and education has been atrocious. 

 

  • The budget measures were deemed unfairly targeting the less financially well off and possibly unAustralian

 

  • The Prime Minister expended any political capital and the public's goodwill on knights and dames.

 

It is easy to blame the electorate for the Government's failure to reform the economy. The electorate are more politically and economically sophisticated today relative to yesteryear. 

 

Governments must explain the reasons for change, and not expect the public to roll over and be accepting of change without proper explanation. And the reforms must be seen as fair.

 

The Australian  - 22 February 2015

66. We must all pull together to solve the budget crisis

 

Are we too consumed with the politics and not enough on the policies? We need our politicians to be more 'policians' than the former. Australians must demand and deserve a better contest of policy ideas between political parties. The overwhelming frustration in more recent times is Opposition parties opposing Government policies without actually offering an alternative policy perspective. Both Abbott in Opposition, and now Shorten are guilty of this. 

 

Is this because politicians tend to underestimate the intelligence of the Australian in accepting major policy reforms? Or is the opposite true? 

 

I believe Australians are accepting of policy reforms in taxation, health, education, pensions etc, so long as the benefits and costs of reforms are deemed to be fairly shared across socio-economic groups. 

 

We cannot afford to continue to do a Greece and 'kick the can down the road'. Our politicians, businesses, unions and community must come together and have a robust and honest discussion on the changes required to ensure Australia's future prosperity. Hawke did it in the 1980s, Abbott should also do so. It will also be a tangible demonstration of Abbott's 'new' consultative approach. 

 

Shorten can be an active participant, or continue to say 'No' to policy solutions not because they are bad, but just for the sake of it! 

 

The Australian  - 22 February 2015

65. Unlikely to be sugar hits for budget bottom line

 

What is lacking is political courage and bi-partisanship in making nation transforming changes. Governments commission a multitude of reports, including on taxation, industry, welfare or health reforms,  but many of the recommendations don't seem to see the light of day. 

 

Political parties are more interested in their own survival rather than the economic enhancement of the nation. Until that mindset changes, and Governments stop tinkering around the edges, Australia's current budgetary predicament will be a stroll in the park relative to future Australian generations' budget challenges. 

 

It's time more courage and a sense of unity is shown by our national leaders across the political spectrum. Otherwise get out of the way and allow those who are willing to make those courageous decisions step in and who ensure the burdens and benefits are distributed fairly across the socio-economic groups.

 

The Australian  - 21 February 2015

64. Tony Abbott sought military advice on go-it-alone invasion of Iraq

 

If this piece originated and was published by a more left wing leaning media outlet, then you may question the authenticity of the findings. But as it has been published by The Australian, then you'd think there could be an iota of substance to this story. 

 

When the Government's closest media allie publishes a story of this nature, then it suggests The Australian has abandoned the Prime Minister and pushing a change in 'Captain'.  Is Murdoch behind it? 

 

If what has been written is true, then it suggests a Prime Minister lacking in intellectual and now mental capacity to lead our nation.

 

The Australian  - 21 February 2015

63. Owen faces inquiry over cabinet paper

 

I can understand why Tim Crakanthorp doesn't want to attend Monday's inquiry. Tim Owen has nothing to lose while Tim Crakanthorp has nothing to gain. We should not lose sight of the fact that someone within the Government actually released the Cabinet-in-Confidence document. There has been a serious breach of Cabinet within the Government, and the document somehow fell into the hands of Tim Crakanthorp and the Labor Party, and now is in the public domain.

 

I believe Tim Crakanthorp should attend the inquiry to make clear his position, but this issue firstmost is a failure in, and of, the Government.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 21 February 2015

62.  GREG RAY: Telling a city’s fortune

 

A couple of years back, myself and colleagues had a brief but fascinating conversation with the then State MP Tim Owen. Tim had just returned from China and was excited about the potential business investment opportunities in Newcastle, which included the possibility of a 'Chinatown' development.

 

Despite the ICAC events, I still have the utmost respect for Tim Owen as I believe he had the best intentions for our city, and his door was always open to constituents. I even believe Jeff McCloy was, and would have continued to be, a good Lord Mayor too. They are men of action and committed to genuinely transforming our city for the better.

 

I don't condone their behaviour of financial misadventures, I do not support the current rail proposal, or how the Baird Government have handled the rail issue.

 

But I do believe that it is because of Owen's and McCloy's election victories that Newcastle became a more confident and vibrant place. They set the wheels in motion, and Newcastle was finally about to move from the 19th to the 21st century - something we never witnessed under previous Labor State Governments, State Members (except for Jodi McKay who also had good intentions but was hamstrung by an incompetent Labor Government) and Council.

 

For Newcastle's sake, I hope we can get past the rail impasse, and build a better and prosperous Newcastle.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 20 February 2015

61. OPINION: Light rail helps transform communities

 

Nathaniel, unfortunately your opinion piece lacks perspicacity.

 

The Baird Government's revitalisation approach is deficient and shortsighted in comparison to the recommended light rail solution detailed in the Cabinet-in-Confidence document. The Baird solution is politically motivated and certainly places the importance of the short term dollar over the real needs of the majority of people in the region, not just today but 30, 50, 100 years from today. The preferred recommended solution however puts the best community and financial interests of the region, at the heart of the decision.

 

And light rail does not transform communities - people transform communities. This goes to the heart of the weakness of the pro-light rail brigade's argument - they think they know what the community wants, rather than actually asking and listening to what the community not just wants, but what we need.

 

Light rail will be a positive addition to our city and region, but not where some people want it, but where it's most needed by all of us.

 

Please also endeavour to see it from other people's perspectives.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 19 February 2015

60. OPINION: Ageism is not an argument

 

Beautifully expressed. I quote Martin Luther King "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” When individuals cannot argue with facts, they resort to the fictions of the primal mind!

 

Newcastle Herald  - 19 February 2015

59. Labor: Rail document found in Owen office

 

You wonder why people have lost confidence in our political system of government. Greek philosopher Plato exclaimed over 2,000 years ago "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." So nothing has changed!

 

Newcastle Herald  - 18 February 2015

58. "This is the best route that connects the city"

 

Quite frankly, you cannot believe anything the Baird Government says about the revitalisation plans for Newcastle. They are fabrications wrapped up in brown paper bags!

 

Newcastle Herald  - 17 February 2015

57. Chosen light rail route: $100m more for slower service

 

To those who argue this information is old news - are you referring to the Baird Government being incompetent, unprincipled, and untrustworthy when it comes to investment decisions for not just our city, but the broader region?

 

This news is unsurprising considering the Baird Government have ducked and weaved on the truth, but the truth invariably always comes to light. No amount of propaganda from the pro-light rail 'Gordon Gekko' puppeteers can over-ride the odious reality of the decisions made by this Government.

 

The Government has treated the majority, not the minority, of people in our region will unadulterated contempt. The Government's rail plans offers a costly, inefficient and unproductive solution to the Newcastle region, particularly over the long term with population growth and increased congestion on our roads.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 17 February 2015

56. Tony Abbott vows to work with backbench, but sacking ruffles some

 

"A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself." (Livy)

 

Abbott has betrayed the trust of the Australian public, betrayed the confidence of his own party, and now for his own political survival, treacherously betrayed 'the Father of the House'. 

 

Here's to restoring the highest Office in the land with trust, truth, and integrity... hopefully sooner than later!

 

The Guardian - 14 February 2015

55. Tony Abbott ripe for the knockout blow

 

The demise of Prime Minister Abbott is likened to witnessing a Shakespearean tragedy in slow motion. The knock out blow will not come from Turnbull, Bishop, nor from Shorten. Abbott will deliver the knock out blow to himself, with his acts of self-sabotage. 

 

In recent days, Abbott's elevated tone reveals a man in despair with the world, unaware that his despair is actually self-inflicted. In a way, it is tragic to watch someone crumble before our very eyes. 

 

Deep down, the majority of Australians do want our public leaders to succeed. But if our leaders are seen unwilling to listen, break the trust with their constituents, or act with hubris, then they only have themselves to blame. 

 

There is a quote by Dwight Eisenhower: "You don’t lead by hitting people over the head—that’s assault, not leadership". To our Prime Minister, start leading with understanding and compassion, and people are more likely to listen and follow you.

 

Sydney Morning Herald - 14 February 2015

54. Brandis asked Gillian Triggs to resign before critical child detention report

 

I am surprised the Abbott Government haven't attempted to abolish the Australian Human Rights Commission by now. Perhaps in the next wave of Federal Budget cuts!!

 

The Guardian  - 13 February 2015

53. Grattan on Friday: Abbott’s ‘good government’ gets lost in another bad week

 

My impression on this past week's events is that Mr Abbott has further undermined his authority. He may have had a 'near death experience', but surely Abbott's Prime Ministership is now on a prolonged and induced coma state. The Leigh Sales interview with the Prime Minister was telling on this front.

 

The Prime Minister has been yelling more in Question Time but it doesn't mean more Australians are now listening. I believe many Australians have stopped listening and are just waiting for the inevitable - the metaphorical passing of our Prime Minister!

 

The Conversation  - 13 February 2015

52. Bali Nine: officials given all-clear to move pair for execution

 

I read that under Indonesian law, someone convicted of child sex abuse receives a maximum 15 years in jail, but tend to only serve between 3 to 5 years. 

 

It seems hypocritical that someone who takes advantage of innocent children is not subjected to the same death sentence as drug smugglers, particularly considering someone makes a choice to buy illicit drugs whereas children are not really given that choice in not being sexually abused. 

 

Such is the twisted logic of a world in which we live!

 

The Guardian - 12 February 2015

51. Meeting vows return of rail

 

Today at Broadmeadow Station a NBN News reporter asked the Transport Minister about Newcastle's light rail project. The Minister was unable to provide any details and did not have a date as to when an announcement would be made regarding the plans.

 

Whose idea was it to get rid of the horse and carriage? At this rate, we may need them back! If it's good enough for the Queen, it's good enough for me.

 

Newcastle Herald - 12 February 2015

50. Attention Joe Hockey! You need to read this - The Experts

 

While I agree with the essence of your article, this time around there appears to be considerable "Coalition haters" within the Coalition itself.

 

And in regards to classing the Senate as "nincompoops", they have ensured unfair and inequitable policies will not see the light of day. Further, Abbott, Hockey, Pyne, and Dutton have been shocking salesmen, shocking negotiators, poor listeners, and lacking a social conscience in policy development.

When the reforms under Hawke, Keating and even under Howard were initiated and implemented in the 1980s, and 1990s, they were underlayed with a social conscience.

 

Also, the cynicism of the public over today's reform agenda is based on politicians overselling the benefits and underselling the costs of reform to individuals and families.

 

The privatisation of health and electricity are cases in point. Politicians spruick the benefits of competition keeping prices down, however an ever-increasing percentage of an individual's or families income are being eaten up increasing health and utility charges.

 

The Abbott Government has attempted to push education and health reforms based on the 'debt and deficit' theme, rather than on how education and health outcomes will benefit Australians.

 

Further, the Abbott Government now risks confusing the message by still pushing the 'debt and deficit' theme, but now is targeting a deficit increasing 'families friendly' budget policy measures.

So what does the Coalition actually stand for?

 

Switzer Business - 12 February 2015

49. Meeting vows return of rail

 

It is wonderful to see all age demographics actively engaged in important issues in our region. We should take heed of the wisdom of our mature age citizens. Some of the comments on the article makes me wonder whether "youth is wasted on the young". Show some respect and decency.

 

Newcastle Herald - 12 February 2015

48. Abbott has failed to make the one promise that could save him: to be fair

 

On last evening's 7.30 report, Leigh Sales interview with the Prime Minister was telling. On numerous occasions, Sales asked 'who is the real Tony Abbott'? Abbott was unable to answer the question. If Abbott doesn't know who he is and what he stands for, how can you expect the rest of Australia to know who our Prime Minister is?

 

Also on the program, Sales asked the Prime Minister what was his vision for the nation. Abbott was incapable of articulating a vision - none whatsoever. His only vision was to bag the Labor Party and to defeat the Labor Party - nothing more, nothing less. 

 

Once Abbott achieved his goal of defeating Labor and became Prime Minister, he did not and still does not understand his position, influence and power as Prime Minister. Apart from one sentence slogans, Abbott is unable to clearly articulate an overarching vision narrative for the nation, and implement a coherent plan which supports that vision. 

 

And that is the crux of Abbott's problem.

 

The Guardian - 10 February 2015

47. Tony Abbott pledges open tender for submarines to win over SA Liberals

 

The Independents and the Greens saw straight through and did not succumb to Abbott's bribery offers in his desperate attempt for the Prime Ministership against Gillard in 2010.

 

For Abbott to offer such an inducement to the South Australian Liberal members must suggest the leadership spill motion vote is on a knife's edge!

 

The Guardian - 8 February 2015

46. Malcolm Turnbull will stand for Liberal leadership if it's declared vacant, say sources

 

If the leadership spill motion fails, it's akin to placing a lid on an active volcano. Lava is starting to spew out and if the Liberal Party do not act decisively on Tuesday by removing Abbott, eventually the mother of all eruptions will wreak havoc on the Party. 

 

Why postpone the inevitable? Take the short term pain now. 

 

This motion differs to the initial Labor challenge against Rudd. Back then, the Australian public did not overwhelmingly support the removal of Rudd as Prime Minister. In Abbott's case, there is overwhelming public support for his removal. The Liberal Party brand will actually be enhanced by a change in leaders. You don't need to be a Rhodes scholar to figure that out!

 

The Guardian - 7 February 2015

45. Liberal MP announces he will move spill motion against Tony Abbott

 

Regardless of what happens at Tuesday's leadership spill motion, the damage is done. The Liberal Party can no longer take the high road against the Labor Party when it comes to leadership shenanigans! 

Even if Abbott wins on Tuesday, his leadership will be the sole focus until the next election. The likely reality is Abbott cannot win the next election, regardless of any future policy announcements. The public have stopped listening. 

 

And I'll add Hockey as Treasurer has also contributed to the predicament Abbott finds himself in. Probably the worst Treasurer in living memory.

 

The Guardian - 6 February 2015

44. Marketplace, open space plans for city railway stations

 

I am fascinated by the survey findings, and would be interested in a breakdown of the groups data and demographic of the participants.

 

It would also be interesting to know what percentage are Liberal versus Labor and other parties voters for the survey. The finding which may reveal this query is the low 10% interested in 'planting trees' and 'rejuvenating beaches'. Considering the Liberal Party being climate change skeptics, and tend to revile against anything environmental, then you could possibly deduct that the majority of the survey participants were Liberal Party voters!

 

The other interesting data that would be interesting to obtain is how many of the survey participants actually used the existing/truncated rail line or even public transport?

 

Also, only 7% said retail stores were important in revitalising the city. So what do the other 93% think will revitalise the city? A light rail? Will this 93% find no reason to visit a revitalised city?

 

These survey findings raises more questions and concerns than certainty that the right revitalisation strategy is being implemented. Happy for anyone to allay my concerns.

 

Newcastle Herald - 6 February 2015

43. Newcastle show holiday scrapped

 

The right call. The Council needs to engage and discuss with the community and businesses on an appropriate and relevant local public holiday that all groups are more likely to embrace, rather than imposing one without proper consultation.

 

Sometimes we need to challenge why we do certain things. The 'Show Day' is one event we should challenge. 'Show Day' is not as relevant and meaningful as it may have been years back. A local public holiday, for example, celebrating the birth of Newcastle may be worth considering and is more likely to have the support of most groups.

 

Newcastle Herald - 5 February 2015

42. Abbott's leadership threatened by policy blunders in absence of a clear rival

 

Ideally, if the Liberal Party wishes to change leaders, it must do so sooner rather than later. 

The rational here is that you would want to ensure the new Prime Minister has sufficient time to put their personal stamp on a revised strategic vision and supported by key policy positions to be announced in the May Federal Budget. 

 

The longer the uncertainty over the leadership drags on, the less time focused on the real job at hand - that is, actually governing the nation.

 

The Guardian - 4 February 2015

41. Does Australia have a 'political crisis'?

 

Don, 

Thank you for your article and insight. 

One perspective worth considering is that Australia has, in some respects, a healthy 'political crisis'. What I mean by this is that Australians are more politically savvy today compared to yesteryear. There is no longer that voter allegiance to a particular political party as there once was. 

In this day and age, the Australian voter is not going to accept as gospel any political party's reform agenda unless it has, for example, clearly articulated the benefits and costs associated with the reform, and any financial burdens are dispersed fairly across the socio-economic groups. 

This has been one of the current Federal Government's greatest failings.As part of the Government's debt and deficit reduction strategy, particularly in social services, education and in health, the public perception is that the Government is targeting the lower socio-economic groups to carry more of the financial burden. Australians see through this and will not support reform which appears overly biased toward one group over another. 

I do not believe the majority of Australians are against reform or are unwilling to make a sacrifice for the longer term betterment of our economy and society. But it needs to be the right type of reform in which the benefits and burdens are distributed fairly. The Labor Party tend to be better at this aspect compared to the Coalition.

 

On Line Opinion - 3 February 2015

40. Accidents do happen, if you let them

 

Graham, 

I think you are grossly underestimating the intelligence of specifically the Queensland, and generally Australian, voter. It is also presumptuous to believe the Liberal Party knows what is best for Australians, and is a key reason why they are in the predicament they now find themselves in. 

The Queensland State election result was extraordinary. The swing against the former Newman Government of in excess of 10% demonstrates political parties cannot rely on the traditional loyal allegiance base of voters as in past years. 

No longer can political parties take a constituent's vote for granted from one election to the next. They must continually listen, engage and understand their constituents' needs, maintain their trust, and clearly communicate the purpose and benefits of policy positions at an individual, family and society level. 

The Federal Coalition Government also risks the same fate of political annihilation at the next election, if they continually fail to heed the needs of the voting public.

The Queensland State election result is no accident, and reveals that if you do not respect the voter, you will not last long in Government. This is one of the beauties of our democracy at work

 

On Line Opinion - 3 February 2015

39. LETTER: ‘Captain’s call’ undemocratic

 

Here we go, another "... go back to where they were born... " solution to miraculously improve Australia's way of life. We must have a different definition in what it means to be Australian, as IMO your comment is "unAustralian". I wonder where we can send Australian born citizens that seemingly make ignorant statements?

 

Newcastle Herald  - 2 February 2015

38. Abbott says he won't stand down and take Australia back to chaos 

 

Abbott's National Press Club speech is revealing in the sense that he knows that he is in the fight for his political life. It was more of a mea culpa speech and seeking forgiveness moreso from his Party room than from the Australian public. 

 

Abbott is asking us to trust him at his word this time around. But the speech did not really reveal the key lessons learnt apart from removal from the policy table of the Paid Parental Leave scheme, and changes in how knights and dames are selected. 

 

Abbott also outlined the reason for change, which was great. However what the Coalition Government needs to understand is that the Australian public have been engaged and understand the reasons to improve the debt situation and make our nation more prosperous. 

 

But to date the public has repudiated the Government's policy approaches to rectifying the debt and deficit issue. Moving forward, the Government must be seen as sharing the burden of debt reduction more equally across all socio-economic groups, not just target the lower socio-economic groups to do all the heavy lifting. 

 

I am not sure today's speech is enough to save the Prime Minister. It was more rhetoric than substance. For the time being it doesn't matter so much what the public thinks, but what the members of the Liberal Party room think - they have the power to change leaders now. 

 

And we'll get that chance in 2016, at the latest.

 

The Guardian - 2 February 2015

37. Tony Abbott still PM, but voters already in a post-Abbott world

 

Abbott's sole vision as Opposition Leader was to return to power, to become Prime Minister at all costs, and consequently was successful in contributing to the downfall of two Prime Ministers. Abbott has achieved this vision, but in becoming Prime Minister, lacked a clear vision for Australia. 

 

And there's a saying, "What goes around, comes around!".By taking down Prime Ministers, Abbott is now getting a taste of his own medicine.

 

Sydney Morning Herald - 2 February 2015

36. Tony Abbott vows to learn the lessons of stunning Queensland electoral rout

 

It's wonderful that our Prime Minister now appears willing to listen to the Australian public's concerns. But is it too little too late, as voters may now no longer want to speak, as they have already made up their minds on who they're voting for come next election? As they say, 'once bitten, twice shy!'...

 

The Guardian - 1 February 2015

35. Queensland election drubbing puts Tony Abbott’s leadership under pressure

 

A tsunami has swept across the LNP political landscape of Queensland. A swing in excess of 10% against the sitting Government clearly reveals there is no longer that loyal allegiance toward a political party compared to yesteryear. 

 

If the Government of the day does not listen and engage to its constituents, break promises and constituents' trust, and fail to clearly articulate policies to voters which has the potential to change the fabric of society, then they will be booted out of office. 

 

The Queensland result virtually seals the fate of Abbott federally. The Liberal Party must be smart in any leadership transition. It cannot afford to repeat the Labor leadership woes between Rudd and Gillard. Abbott will be wise to step down, avoid a brutal leadership battle, and the Coalition transition harmoniously to Australia's next Prime Minister.

 

The Guardian - 1 February 2015

34. Social media is not electronic graffiti

 

Unfortunately, the derisive throwaway 'electronic graffiti' comment about social media reinforces the view how anachronistic and out of step with modern society the Prime Minister is. The wrong Prime Minister to lead Australia in our 21st century world.

 

Lowy Interpreter - 31 January 2015

33. Tony Abbott to scale back paid parental leave scheme again

 

Abbott is a lame duck, with the Prime Ministership seemingly terminal. With the Paid Parental Leave scheme also on its last legs, together with their signature education and health policies, so what do the Liberal Party actually stand for?

 

Will they move more to the 'centre' on the policy debate front? How will the traditional Liberal voters feel about that? We'll get a better sense on Monday at the National Press Club, and whether Abbott can miraculously save his Prime Ministership.

 

The Guardian - 31 January 2015

32. Can Abbott survive ‘knightmare’ issue: poll

 

Abbott's days as leader are numbered. The only viable Coalition alternative and the person who garners the most respect and credibility within both the business sector and the community in general is Turnbull. Labor and Shorten will prefer Abbott to remain as leader as Labor victory is virtually assured while Abbott remains as Prime Minister.

 

If Turnbull becomes leader, then it won't be enough for Shorten to continue to play 'roadblock' to key Government legislation. Shorten must start to clearly articulate Labor's policy positions on key issues, particularly how they plan to contain and overtime reduce Australia's debt levels.

 

For now, the litmus test for Abbott's survival is the Queensland State election. If the swing against the LNP is greater than 10% or they somehow manage to lose office, then I think Abbott's leadership's fate is sealed - Abbott will be a dead Prime Minister walking.

 

 

Newcastle Herald - 30 January 2015

31. TORN APART: Jets players sacked

 

There must be method to Tinkler's madness, but I just can't see it yet. Not sure that I ever will!

 

If that is how the Newcastle Jets run the club, who in their right mind will want to come and play here? Stubbins has lost all credibility and respect from this action, and demonstrates he can't be trusted to be approached if a player has an issue or problem. In Stubbins case, when the truth hurts, you don't accept it, you shoot the messenger or in this case the messengers!

 

Sure, players need to share responsibility for this season's performance. But wasn't it Stubbins responsible in signing some of the players? If so, doesn't it reveal Stubbins lack of judgement on player selections?

 

It certainly is an embarrassing day in Newcastle sport. Unfortunately this saga is not over by a long shot. But my prediction is that by the end of this debacle, Stubbins will have resigned, as his position will have become untenable.

 

Newcastle Herald - 29 January 2015

30. Tony Abbott has much bigger problems than a rogue knight

 

The opinion piece reads as fragmented streams of consciousness cry for help!

 

I must be living in a parallel universe. Abbott has never been 'likeable' nor have a 'knockabout' swagger about him. Many Australians, including on the Liberal side of politics have an instinctual uncomfortableness with Abbott. The perception is one of Abbott is more of a political thug than statesmanlike. 

 

It is hypocritical to suggest Shorten as behaving with 'empty opportunism'. Abbott's central focus during his time as Opposition Leader was exactly that - 'empty opportunism' - not to hold the previous Government to account, but with the sole purpose of bringing the Government down. It also seems to be forgotten that Abbott opposed virtually any key issue the former Labor Government initiated. And in regards to policy, Abbott's election win was based on one sentence slogans and deceit through broken election promises. 

The Coalition cannot win with Abbott, or at best be returned as a minority government. Turnbull is the Coalition's best bet, who is more likely to implement more equitable and evolutionary, as distinct from revolutionary, policy changes that will be more palatable with the Australian public. 

 

I support the views of Westacott in regards to the notion of challenging economic headwinds to be confronted by Australia. However the inference that Australians aren't up to the 'challenge' is a falsehood. It's not that Australians necessarily want Labor returned to power, but desire a Government, regardless of who is in power to implement, albeit difficult, policies in which any financial burdens or benefits are shared more fairly than targeting already struggling lower socio-economic group. 

 

As like our Prime Minister, the opinion piece misjudges the reality of the situation and demeans the intellect of the Australian public.

 

Sydney Morning Herald - 29 January 2015

29. Rupert Murdoch demands Peta Credlin resign as her 'patriotic duty

 

Not a bright move by Murdoch. By commenting, Murdoch has put the Prime Minister between a rock and a hard place, and is now unlikely to make any move regarding Credlin, assuming that was an option. 

 

Regardless of whether Credlin is pushed or resigns, it will be directly portrayed as if Murdoch is directing how the Government manages its affairs.

 

If I was Abbott and Credlin, i'd negotiate a departure at least until the end of the year, unless they are both gone by then!

 

The Guardian - 28 January 2015

28. Coalition MPs trail in eight out of 11 marginals as budget issues bite, poll says

 

Any goodwill the Coalition Government had with the Australian public when they won office has evaporated. What is fascinating to observe when it comes to this Government is not so much the dislike toward Abbott from typical anti-Liberal voters, which is virtually a given, but the disdain that Liberal voters actually have toward 'their' Prime Minister. 

 

It is not just about the broken election promises, the abysmal management and salesmanship of the Federal Budget, or even the decision to hand Prince Philip a knighthood. It is also important to have such qualities as trust, respect, empathy, the ability to connect, to communicate, and to engage. Australian voters across the political spectrum, including Liberal Party voters, sense Abbott lack these qualities. 

 

We must remember that the Coalition did not win Government because of the voters' affinity with Abbott, but because of the dysfunctional leadership tussle between Rudd and Gillard. That is less likely now because of how Labor choose their leader now. 

 

I believe the damage is already done, and assuming Abbott is still leader by the time of the next election, at best the Coalition can achieve is a hung Parliament. Based on their recent inability to negotiate key legislation through the Senate, imagine with a Lower House minority Government!

 

The time for change is now, not just for the Liberal Party, but moreso for Australian society.

 

The Guardian - 28 January 2015

27. LETTER: Majority wants something else

 

Everyone you speak to, within and outside of Newcastle, has an opinion about the rail line. We’ve been so absorbed in passionately expressing what we think should happen, that we’ve shamefully neglected to ask the railway how she feels about her sense of betrayal and abandonment.

 

I visited the grand majestic lady of Newcastle on Australia Day and who graciously shared with me a poem expressing how she felt.

 

Abandoned, with no where to go
I stand here stationless
Forlorn
Where is my home?

 

Loyalty, means nothing to you 
I carried you for over a century
Now stranded
Feeling a fool

 

Worthlessness, you made me feel 
No longer needed 
Selfish you
With a better deal?

 

Divided, between city and shore
That’s what you said
Greener pastures
You supposedly adore

 

Regret, one day it shall be clear 
Until then, I ponder in hope 
Alone 
With the tracks of my tears :(

 

So next time you share your thoughts on our grandest of ladies, please do so with dignity and respectfully. She has given so much to the past and present of our town, and deserves nothing less.

 

,.. and she deserves nothing less than a knighthood too.

 

Newcastle Herald  - 27 January 2015

26. Decision to knight Prince Philip heavily criticised

 

Our Prime Minister certainly devalued Australia Day by knighting Prince Philip. Even members of Abbott's own party and side of politics are embarrassed and incensed by the appointment.

 

Prime Minister Abbott has pushed the idea of 'Team Australia', but by not even consulting his own party, it is clear Abbott is not a team player, and out of touch with 21st century Australia.

 

His political judgement on a number of policy issues has been found wanting, but yesterday's announcement could well be the turning point in Abbott's downfall as Prime Minister

 

Newcastle Herald  - 27 January 2015

25. Abbott navigates his crucial 'year of reform'

 

Reform of our political system must be considered. 

One reform is that when it comes to election policy commitments by the respective political parties, their policies should be formerly verified by an independent body at least several months prior to an election. This allows a party's package of policies to be critically analysed to see whether they are fully costed and funded. 

Another reform is that a party's policies must be placed in either 'core' or 'noncore' categories. In regard to 'core' policies (e.g. a maximum of 5) the elected Government is permitted to automatically legislate these policies. Voters will also be better-informed and engaged before and on election day when they cast their vote, and the elected Government has a stronger mandate in fulfilling their key policy commitments. 

A further essential reform is to implement fixed 4 year political terms. This will provide greater stability and certainty during the political cycle, allows the Government greater time to implement longer-term policy initiatives, improve business and investment confidence, stability and decision making. It will offer cost savings by staging fewer elections, greater certainty for voters

 

ABC NEWS - 26 January 2015

24. Prince Philip awarded Knight of the Order of Australia by Prime Minister Tony Abbott

 

Our Prime Minister has just devalued Australia Day!

 

Sydney Morning Herald  - 26 January 2015

23. Bali Nine: Alan Jones, Asher Keddie and Wendy Whiteley back mercy video plea

 

We've all been guilty of making mistakes, some perhaps more serious than others. In this case, unless there is a miracle, two Australians will pay the ultimate price. Despite their heinous crime, if Chan and Sukumaran have genuinely rehabilitated, then they deserve a second chance. 

 

But it doesn't matter what we think - we need to respect Indonesia's laws and justice system, as we would expect others to respect ours. 

 

I hope Indonesian President Widodo can find compassion in his heart and know that because of Indonesia's rehabilitation program, they have successfully reformed two men in being better human beings. 

 

Mahatma Gandhi said "The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong." Lets hope President Widodo has the strength to forgive these two Australians and save them from their death sentence

 

The Guardian - 25 January 2015

22. Bill Shorten: move to a republic would reflect a modern and inclusive Australia

 

Becoming a Republic and having an Australian Head of State, whatever form that will take, is more than anything, a symbolic gesture of coming of age as a truly 'independent' nation. And an Indigenous Australian as our first Head of State would be something special.

 

What I believe is just as important is to critically assess Australia's system of government, considering a new way of governing which ensures government continues to maintain its relevancy and accountable to all Australians. 

 

One option touted is the abolition of the State level of government, with regional based 'super' Councils with greater revenue powers. Surely this offers a great opportunity in reducing duplication and inconsistencies in laws and programs; increased transparency in governing; cost-savings in the hundreds of millions if not billions; and better decision-making and power at the grass-roots local level.

 

The Guardian - 25 January 2015

21. Tony Abbott's trust deficit disaster is paralysing his government

 

Prime Minister Abbott is a political ideological street-fighter. Abbott's instinctual nature is to thrive through 'divide and conquer', and to create fear and doubt in the minds of people. These are his strengths. That is his nature, his natural disposition. 

 

Abbott lacks the ability and quality to connect, to truly listen and understand other people's needs, to bring people together, and to empathise. These are fundamental qualities in being a leader, and crucially as a Prime Minister. 

 

At best Abbott is a manager, but not a leader. He is not a visionary - his instinct is to survive, not to thrive. The accidental leader of the then Opposition Liberal Party is now the wrong Prime Minister for our time. The Party now know this, and the people know this. But it's not in Abbott's DNA to accept this.

 

The Guardian - 24 January 2015

20. OPINION: Silent majority must speak and be heard

 

I agree with much in what Pru Goward expresses in her opinion piece.

 

I do think though that its disingenuous to allude to the 'silent majority' to stand up and be heard. Is that not what elections are about, for the 'silent majority' to express an opinion? The voters of Newcastle already responded on 25 October 2014. Was the message lost in translation? And the impending March election will again be a referendum in Newcastle and other surrounding electorates with respect to the rail line.

 

And it is wonderful to know of the in excess of $1b in investment - I'd be interested to know what proportion of this investment is directly related to being influenced by the proposed rail removal? 10%, 50%, 100%? Assuming the rail remained, and the revitalisation of Newcastle continued, what percentage of this investment will be withdrawn?

 

Again, the majority of Novocastrians support change, and the revitalisation of Newcastle. For Pru Goward to think otherwise makes me wonder who she is in contact with, and whether she has dialled the wrong number, confusing Newcastle Australia with Newcastle, England!

 

Newcastle Herald - 24 January 2015

19. Australian workplace inquiry to review minimum wage and penalty rates

 

As if the Abbott Government is not grappling with enough challenging and electorally toxic issues, particularly in health and education. Lets throw in another vexed issue in industrial relations. Does Abbott have a political death-wish?

 

It appears poor political judgement by Abbott and his advisers and music to Labor's ears. So much for resetting the policy agenda button in 2015 - sounds more like a self-destruct button!

 

The Guardian - 23 January 2015

18. LETTER: Headland project sounds like bling

 

Kim,

 

I am comfortable with a development on the former bowling club site, so long as the development architecturally and seamlessly blends into the King Edward Park surroundings. An option is to have both - some development as well as a public space for other recreational use.

 

It doesn't have to be one against the other. I see this as a win-win outcome for all, so long as people from all sides start with the premise of an open mind on this issue.

 

Newcastle Herald - 23 January 2015

17. OPINION: Economy not all dark clouds

 

Dr Rai, I enjoyed your opinion piece. I also believe the psychological mind-set of the consumer and businesses play a key, though not the only, role in the performance of an economy. In times of impending economic downturn, Governments must implant into the minds of people the seeds of hope for economic prosperity.

 

The Abbott Federal Government’s negative 'debt and deficit' war-style rhetoric does little to inspire public confidence and resurrect a deflated economy. Further, as the GFC showed, pure austerity measures will not grow an economy, but growth oriented policies combined with reducing inefficiencies in an economy can

 

Newcastle Herald - 22 January 2015

16. LETTER: Refugee treatment shameful

 

I would not hold your breath in the Abbott Government showing compassion. The unfortunate reality is that the issue of asylum seekers is a politically motivated one. It tends to ungraciously play itself out at election time along the low road of politics, The issue of is not unique to Australia and exists more profoundly overseas. There are in excess of 40 million misplaced persons, and Australia's perceived problem is not as significant as other countries are experiencing.

 

What I find fascinating is that in our modern world of globalism, in which money, goods and services flows freely across borders, when it comes to flow of people across borders, humans are still territorially tribal.

 

We need a regional and global based solution to this issue. I’ve written previously that we need to:

 

* confront and address the root causes of why asylum seekers seek refuge, and pursue measures to minimise the likelihood of people fleeing their homeland;

 

* pursue strategies to breakdown smuggling networks which inhibit asylum seekers from embarking on their perilous journey;

 

* establish regional processing centres at pre-determined locations across the globe (which may well include Australia);

 

* establish a fairer resettlement process which delivers a more equitable spread in sharing the burden of asylum seekers and refugees across the globe. This ensures no single nation alone needs to carry the weight of a global issue;

 

* comply with international law obligations and create a more compassionate national legislative framework for asylum-seekers who arrive at its borders to ensure they are treated fairly and humanely;

 

* limit the timeframe asylum seekers remain in regional processing centres;

 

* raise the level of financial and other resource related aid to the United Nations and international organisations to support the regional processing centres

 

Newcastle Herald - 22 January 2015

15. LETTER: Rail supporters must re-evaluate

 

Nathan,

 

Though I am not aligned with your rationale, i fully respect the shift in your position. For the numerous reasons I have previously outlined on these pages, I believe the Government's strategy and approach concerning the rail line is fundamentally flawed on many levels, and is now more about political gamesmanship than anything else.

 

Not one person or group have been able to clearly articulate and demonstrate that the revitalisation of the Newcastle CBD is predicated on removing the rail line. And when individuals resort to character assassinations rather than dealing in facts, they have already lost the battle of credibility and respect, regardless of who wins the war.

 

At the end of the day, I will respect the umpire's decision. But until that day of reckoning, I will stay true to my principles and in what I believe is the right thing to do. It's not the French Revolution nor America's fight for Independence, but its about standing up for what you believe is right and ensuring Governments do not 'railroad' or force decisions upon its citizens which advantage the few to the detriment of the whole.

 

I wish you well and hope that in the end, we all achieve an outcome which benefits and serves the best interests of all of Newcastle.

 

Newcastle Herald -  21 January 2015

14. LETTER: Stop the debate, it’s time to unite

 

 

Hi Peter,

 

Thank you for your letter and contributing to the rail debate without resorting to ridicule and demeaning anyone who has an opposing view. I congratulate you on your respectful opinion on the issue.

 

I believe the majority of Novocastrians are united toward a common goal - to resurrect the heart of Newcastle's CBD. The means in achieving this common goal will differ between individuals and between various self-interest groups. This is clearly the case on this issue.

 

While the time for debate should have passed, unfortunately the belief by sections of the community is that the State Government have ignored their concerns and pandered predominantly to the needs of certain group over others. It could be argued a proper discussion and debate has not occurred on this issue.

 

The ICAC investigations have also fueled doubts in Novocastrians' minds, with State Members of Parliament resigning their positions for illegally accepting political donations from a banned group. This places doubt in one's mind as to whether there was undue influence in the decision-making outcomes associated with the revitalisation of Newcastle.

 

The other concern is the Government refuses to release even a summary business case and cost/benefit analysis for introducing light rail and removing the heavy rail. As a prudent businessman, I know you would want to know the tangible and intangible costs and benefits of a project to ensure its viability before proceeding with it. What is the Government hiding?

 

We need to ensure our taxpayer funds are spent wisely, particularly in light of the Productivity Commission recently questioning the viability of Canberra's light rail initiative. And spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the marginal perception of opening the city to the harbour, considering existing buildings block the majority of the views seems a dubious waste of taxpayer dollars.

 

Having resided and worked in various parts of Sydney for a number of years, my main mode of commuting was public trains, buses, ferries, and light rail. On occasions to travel to and fro from work, or to social activities, I had to catch up to three modes of transport - on average 5 to 6 days a week back and forth. Because of the nature of the Sydney transport system and where you lived in Sydney, you accepted the need to catch different modes of transport to your destination.

 

Based on personal experience, it seems non-sensical and inefficient in requiring a commuter to change at the proposed Wickham interchange to connect to another mode of transport for a up to 15-20 minutes to reach the top of town. It will increase inefficiencies, and reduce productivity - time is money, money is time - more time on transport, less time with family.

 

We need to envisage Newcastle not just in our lifetime, but also for future generations. With the population of our region to increase over the coming decades, we'll likely need a more efficient public transport system to handle increased patronage, including less private cars on the roads to minimise future congestion.

 

I believe the majority of Novocastrians support progress and development, so long as it is the right sort of development, which engages, consults and factors in the concerns of all parties. I believe many in Newcastle support light rail, but in the right areas and where it is needed most.

 

My view is that the revitalisation of the city or embracing change does not necessarily equate to cutting the rail line. There will and there already is development and rejuvenation occurring in the city, which is creating employment opportunities now and into the future. I cite the new Law Courts, the University of Newcastle Civic campus, and apartment developments, which will in time, increase patronage on the existing rail line, and contribute to reviving the City’s fortunes.

 

The reality is the existing rail line did not cause the economic decline of Newcastle's CBD. And the reason not many people use the existing rail line today is not because of the rail line, but because there is no real incentive to visit the CBD. People have moved to the suburban shopping malls for their shopping experience. A light rail will not revive its fortunes.

 

I agree that as part of the development there must be integration between 'heritage' and 'new' Newcastle. We need to avoid the miss-mash of development as witnessed in Sydney. I remind people that the historical 'The Rocks, Sydney' was saved from development vandalism back in the 1970s, and is today a popular and picturesque place to visit. We must learn from other cities' mistakes rather than repeating them.

 

I have confidence in Newcastle and its economy, and believe there is now and will be many opportunities in the pipeline, which will benefit your valued, and strong member base into the future, with or without the truncation of the rail line.

 

I hope in time we can find the things that bind us instead of dividing our community with the rail line and the betterment of our beloved City and the region.

 

Wishing you all the best and for a prosperous and united Newcastle.

 

Yours sincerely,

Dino

 

Newcastle Herald - 21 January 2015

13. McCloy's challenge to political donations laws may delay ICAC report

 

I have no fundamental issue with Jeff McCloy, anyone or a group for that matter making political donations. So long as it is disclosed in the public domain to ensure transparency and accountability by both the donator and recipient of the donations.

 

In this particular case, the law as it currently stands is clear but unfortunately there seemed to be a total disregard and disrespect of the law by the Liberal Party and the donator in this case. Mr McCloy should have raised the constitutional challenge prior to making the illegal donations. If that had been the case, he'd likely still be Lord Mayor!

 

Having said the above, I support Mr McCloy's High Court challenge.

 

Newcastle Herald - 20 January 2015

12. Forecast: $500,000 to put a 2015 baby through Sydney's private schools

 

At this rate, we'll need to also start saving for our great great great grandchildren to obtain a decent education, let alone our children! The Government should evaluate a more rigorous home schooling approach to education which doesn't cripple families' household budgets in the future.

 

Sydney Morning Herald - 20 January 2015

11. OPINION: Committee query off track

 

On a side though related issue, where is Nuatali Nelmes and Sharon Claydon on this issue? Is Tim Crakanthorp left to fight this issue on his own? While it is a 'State' issue, surely Newcastle's Federal Labor member and Labor Lord Mayor need to be more active in this debate. They seem to be missing in action on the number one issue in our city today. Their silence is deafening!

 

Newcastle Herald - 20 January 2015

10. Independent enters Newcastle council byelection

 

I believe Newcastle will be better served by having an "Independent" represent constituents' needs. But the candidate must truly be an independent, not a closet 'Liberal' or 'Labor' sympathiser directed by puppet masters, or a wolf in sheep's clothing!

 

Newcastle Herald - 17 January 2015

9. LETTER: Crossing favours flow of traffic

 

Mr Wilson's logic is shortsighted and flawed. What will traffic look like when or if the light rail is introduced from Wickham? Does Mr Wilson not realise the same issues will be experienced if light rail is implemented?

 

One of the objectives of Newcastle's revitalisation is to bring more businesses and people into the city. Using statistics of 22,000 car users versus 2040 train patrons is therefore irrelevant as the number of rail travellers will significantly increase with the city's regeneration. Otherwise, why spend hundreds of millions of dollars on light rail which based on Mr Wilson's rationale will surely become a 'white elephant'!

 

And in years and decades to come, the region's population will grow and will result in increased cars on our roads. Newcastle must plan for a future in which there are less cars and congestion on its roads. Otherwise, getting stuck at the Wickham railway gates will be the least of your problems, as Newcastle will become car gridlocked on our roads.

 

The Newcastle region must develop an integrated and more efficient public transport system in which more people use it - the current plan does not achieve this. Newcastle must take a holistic view of its future, not a piecemeal and myopic perspective as it appears today!

 

Newcastle Herald -  17 January 2015

8. OPINION: City redevelopment will lead to more jobs

 

Unfortunately the piece reads in a patronising manner, especially toward Margaret Henry. The piece starts with an 'economist' reference but from that point sadly lacks any real substantive economic data to support the points made. Where is the business case, where is the cost/benefit analysis, where is the evidence in Newcastle's case that the economic, social, cultural, community and environmental benefits of light rail outweighes the existing heavy rail infrastructure?

 

The majority of Novocastrians are all for progress and development, but it needs to be the right sort of development which engages, consults and factors in the concerns of all parties. I believe if you ask anyone in Newcastle about light rail, they will respond that they support it, but in the right areas and where it is needed most.

 

What the writer also seems to conveniently neglect to communicate is the revitalisation of the city is not dependent on cutting the rail line - GPT for one is clear on this issue. There will and there already is development and rejuvenation occurring in the city, which is creating employment opportunities now and into the future.

 

Can the writer, in fact anyone, inform me what developments will not occur if the existing rail line remains? I am happy to be convinced otherwise if someone has the hard evidence that shows the truncation of the rail line will actually benefit the Newcastle region. Is this too much to ask?

 

Newcastle Herald -  16 January 2015

7. Medicare rebate cuts off the agenda

 

Is the Abbott Government's Ministry the most diabolical since Federation? The Government's broken election promises, its Federal Budget fiasco, its poor salesmanship of their policies, and backflips on policy positions reveal a dysfunctional Government out of touch with the broader community. The Government is even out of step with its core business self-interest group supporters such as the AMA on the Medicare rebate issue!

 

So much for Abbott wanting to reset the policy agenda in 2015 - two weeks into the new year and already a policy backflip. The lack of engagement and consultation with the community seems to be a key ingredient of the present Federal Liberal Party's recipe for policy development! Certainty a recipe for political disaster, particularly if they don't know what it stands for, and continuing to shift like the wind on policy positions!

 

Newcastle Herald -  15 January 2015

6. EDITORIAL: Coalition tackles Medicare

 

Australia's health system certainly needs to be more sustainable, particularly with the ever-increasing ageing population in the coming decades. An increasing percentage of an individual's and families' income appear to be swallowed up by private health premiums, greater than the rise in the CPI. There will reach a point in the forseeable future in which private health will become unaffordable for more and more families and ironically place more pressure and stress on families.

 

I wonder whether Australians would be more accepting of an increase in the Medicare Levy from 1.5% to up to 3%, with the choice of opting out of private health without penalty?

 

Newcastle Herald -  14 January 2015

5. Save Our Rail tent embassy established

 

In other cultures, elderly citizens are respected and revered for their wisdom. In our culture, or perhaps it's a Newcastle phenomena, the opposite appears to be the case. Every citizen, regardless of age, has the right to participate and contribute to issues and debate in our community. The venom toward our elderly citizens in regard to this issue is nothing short of disgraceful. It says more about the character of the person hurling the discriminatory abuse than anything else. Lets show a little more decorum and dignity toward our elderly citizens, and be thankful for their knowledge, wisdom and contribution in our community

 

Newcastle Herald -  13 January 2015

4. Land claim on rail line

 

So this is Newcastle's version of 'civil war'! There will come a time in which the opponents and proponents of the rail issue will need to come together and reach a consensus which meets community and business key objectives. There will need to be give and take on both sides.

 

Ultimately we all have the same vision-to fulfil our potentialities and better our city. Our political leaders from all sides have failed to show real leadership and endeavour to resolve this escalating Mexican standoff. We need our key local community, business and political representatives to come together and sensibly resolve this divisive issue. That's what real leadership is about! It's time our local 'leaders' showed that quality now.

 

Newcastle Herald -  8 January 2015

3. Jodi Mckay takes a different track on rail

 

In 2008, when GPT pressured Jodi McKay to remove the railway, Jodi noted and quoted in the NH “In regard to the rail line, the community has spoken on that issue and they want the rail line to stay and until the community tells us otherwise our position remains the same, the rail line will stay in place,” I believe Jodi's position change to support light rail was more to do with saving face politically with GPT threatening to pull out of investing in Newcastle... which they did anyway!

 

Newcastle Herald - 6 January 2015

2. VOX POP: What commuters said at Hamilton station today

 

This quote from a commuter sums it up, "I think it’s silly that people are getting off the train 10 minutes from Newcastle and getting onto a bus." Assuming the new interchange at Wickham, a previous 5 minute trip into the CBD on the existing rail line will now likely be extended to 15-20 minutes by having to transfer to the light rail. As they say, time is money, money is time! Can we now also expect productivity levels to decline in our local economy due to the introduction of light rail?

 

Newcastle Herald - 5 January 2015

1. LETTER: Newcastle needs to shine

 

Newcastle must ensure there is integration between 'heritage' and a 'newer' Newcastle as part of its revitalisation. We don't want a mis-mash of development as has been the case with Sydney. Melbourne style development is preferable. I also remind all that the historical 'The Rocks, Sydney' was saved from development vandalism back in the 1970s, and is today a popular and picturesque place to visit. We must learn from other cities' mistakes rather than repeating them.

 

Newcastle Herald - 1 January 2015

bottom of page